Open Source vs. Proprietary Software
It is well known that users of open source software, such as those who routinely work with computers commanded by Linux systems, generally feel proud of the security that these programs provide with respect to closed systems of their own. Other signatures, say Microsoft Windows or Apple Mac.
However, experts today, after many years of discussions, still do not agree on this question. Is open source software more secure than closed programs, or vice versa? The truth is that, in general terms, both sides have their reasons with which to defend their arguments. On the one hand, users of open source applications and systems argue that, because the source code is available to the eyes of the world, it is much easier to locate potential security holes and vulnerabilities that endanger the data. The users.
On the other hand, those who consider closed systems are safer in this regard, they claim that having access only the experts to the source code of their applications, is more complicated than leaks or insertions occur malware in this type of Systems. It should be noted that, for example, Google rewards people who discover security holes in their Chrome software, although it is not the only technology giant to use these tactics.
Safety is paramount in both cases
In fact, many companies are spending many millions on making their proposals as secure as possible, arguing that the security of their projects is one of their priorities, all in order to try to stop the attackers from violating their systems. On the other hand, others say that when the source code is public, more eyes are available to detect possible vulnerabilities or errors in that code, so it will always be faster and easier to put solutions in order to gain security.
Either way, in either case, what has been more than proven is that security is not guaranteed at any time, whether we refer to open source proposals or not. However, it is also true that what is sought is that the risks of being attacked will be reduced as much as possible. As an example, Linux systems have long been considered a safe operating system, due in large part to the advantages offered by their design. Since its code is open, many people incorporate improvements that other Linux users benefit from, unlike the Windows or MacOS proposals,
In the same way, you have to keep in mind that, while Windows dominates the desktop environment, Linux is widely used in servers and other elements of great importance where security in fundamental.
What do you guys think, is open source software safer than proprietary software?